Module MSE-4090:
Blood Sciences
Module Facts
Run by School of Medical and Health Sciences
30.000 Credits or 15.000 ECTS Credits
Semester 1 & 2
Organiser: Dr Dylan Jones
Overall aims and purpose
This module is designed to enable students to acquire Masters level knowledge and understanding of the field of Blood Sciences. The module will facilitate a deeper understanding of haematology, coagulation and clinical chemistry in both health and disease. Students will also undertake to learn the role blood sciences also have in therapeutic management of patients by studying blood and stem cell transfusions.
Course content
This module will describe how blood science plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of patients within the health system. Lectures will discuss many of the major conditions of significance to the health service ranging from anaemia, leukaemia, coagulopathies, endocrine dysfunction and disorders of the acid-base balance. During the module the molecular mechanisms behind many common conditions will be explored and the role of molecular pathology in diagnosis will be detailed in conjunction with classical methods of detection.
Assessment Criteria
excellent
Primary criteria
Comprehensive knowledge & detailed understanding. Clear evidence of extensive background study & originality. Highly focussed, relevant and well structured answers. Arguments logically presented and defended with evidence and examples. Excellent presentation skills with very accurate communication.
Secondary Criteria
A* Outstanding
Exceeds expectations for most primary criteria Complete command of subject and other relevant areas Ideas/arguments are highly original
A+ Excellent
Exceeds expectations for some primary criteria Complete command of subject Ideas/arguments are highly original
A Good
Meets all primary criteria Command of subject but with minor gaps in knowledge areas Ideas/arguments are mostly original
A- Meets requirements of Class
Meets most but not all primary criteria Complete command of subject but with some gaps in knowledge Ideas/arguments are mostly original
threshold
Primary criteria
A threshold student demonstrates knowledge of key areas & principles, and understands the main elements of the subject area, although gaps and weaknesses in the argument are evident. No evidence of background study and wider reading. Answer focussed on question but also with some irrelevant material and weaknesses in structure & argument. Answers have several factual/computational errors. No original interpretation. No links between topics are described. Limited problem solving skills. Some weaknesses in presentation accuracy & delivery.
Secondary Criteria
C+ Good within the class
Exceeds expectations for some primary criteria Strong factual knowledge with some weaknesses in understanding Ideas/arguments are limited but are well presented
C Mid-level
Matches all primary criteria Moderate factual knowledge with some weaknesses in understanding Ideas/arguments are limited presented with weaknesses in logic/presentation
C- Meets requirements of class
Matches most but not all primary criteria Moderate factual knowledge with several weaknesses in understanding Ideas/arguments are limited presented with weaknesses in logic/presentation
good
Primary criteria
Good students demonstrate strong knowledge & understanding of most but not all of the subject area. Limited evidence of background study. The answer is focussed with good structure. Arguments are presented coherently, mostly free of factual/computational errors. Some limited original interpretation. Well know links between topics are described. Problems are addressed by existing methods/approaches. Good presentation with accurate communication
Secondary Criteria
B+ Good
Exceeds expectations for most primary criteria Command of subject but with gaps in knowledge Some ideas/arguments original
B Mid-level
Meets all primary criteria Strong factual knowledge and understanding Ideas/arguments are well presented by few are original
B- Meets requirements of class
Meets most but not all primary criteria Strong factual knowledge with minor weaknesses in understanding Most but not all ideas/arguments are well presented and few are original
Learning outcomes
-
Critically discuss the role of molecular methodologies in the diagnosis of disease.
-
Critically discuss the impact disease can have on the haematological system.
-
Critically discuss the importance of quality assurance in Blood Sciences.
-
Critically discuss the role of transfusion sciences in patient management.
-
Critically discuss the impact disease can have on common and uncommon clinical chemistry markers (U+Es, LFTs, TFTs etc)
Assessment Methods
Type | Name | Description | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Haematology Case Study | 40.00 | ||
Clinical Chemistry Case Study | 40.00 | ||
Presentation | 20.00 |
Teaching and Learning Strategy
Hours | ||
---|---|---|
Lecture | Semester 1 5 x 2 hours lecture Semester 2 5 x 2 hours lecture |
20 |
Private study | Directed and self-directed reading around the topic to develop in-depth knowledge and preparation for tutorial sessions and assessments. |
260 |
Tutorial | Semester 1 5 x 2 hours tutorial Semester 2 5 x 2 hours tutorial |
20 |
Transferable skills
- Literacy - Proficiency in reading and writing through a variety of media
- Numeracy - Proficiency in using numbers at appropriate levels of accuracy
- Computer Literacy - Proficiency in using a varied range of computer software
- Self-Management - Able to work unsupervised in an efficient, punctual and structured manner. To examine the outcomes of tasks and events, and judge levels of quality and importance
- Exploring - Able to investigate, research and consider alternatives
- Information retrieval - Able to access different and multiple sources of information
- Inter-personal - Able to question, actively listen, examine given answers and interact sensitevely with others
- Critical analysis & Problem Solving - Able to deconstruct and analyse problems or complex situations. To find solutions to problems through analyses and exploration of all possibilities using appropriate methods, rescources and creativity.
- Presentation - Able to clearly present information and explanations to an audience. Through the written or oral mode of communication accurately and concisely.
- Argument - Able to put forward, debate and justify an opinion or a course of action, with an individual or in a wider group setting
- Self-awareness & Reflectivity - Having an awareness of your own strengths, weaknesses, aims and objectives. Able to regularly review, evaluate and reflect upon the performance of yourself and others
Resources
Resource implications for students
All resources needed to complete this module are provided. Computers can be accessed in multiple locations across the university. All teaching materials will be available on Blackboard. Completed assignments will be uploaded onto Turnitin through Blackboard. Limited number of textbooks will be available through the University library.
Talis Reading list
http://readinglists.bangor.ac.uk/modules/mse-4090.htmlReading list
Postgraduate Haematology by A. Victor Hoffbrand (Editor), Daniel Catovsky (Editor), Edward G. D. Tuddenham (Editor) Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, by Carl A. Burtis PhD (Author), David E. Bruns MD (Author)