Module NHS-4305:
Leadership and Quality
Leadership and Quality Improvement in Health and Social Care 2026-27
NHS-4305
2026-27
School of Health Sciences
20 credits
Module Organiser:
Elizabeth Mason
Overview
This module is perfect for health and social care professionals seeking to enhance their leadership skills as part of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) or those working towards a Specialist Practice Qualification (SPQ). It focuses on empowering healthcare professionals to critically evaluate and apply leadership principles that drive quality improvement and innovation in clinical practice.
The module explores the dynamic relationship between leadership and quality improvement within contemporary health and social care settings. Grounded in the principles of evidence-based practice and professional accountability, it equips students with the critical skills and knowledge required to lead compassionate, inclusive, and innovative change.
Key areas of focus include the importance of compassionate leadership, inclusive co-production, and collaborative practice in achieving sustainable healthcare improvements. Learners will develop a deeper understanding of evidence-based strategies for improving patient care, evaluating clinical decision-making processes, and leading multidisciplinary teams in complex healthcare settings.
This module also explores how effective leadership can shape healthcare delivery, improve team dynamics, and enhance patient outcomes through quality improvement approaches and measurable outcomes. Healthcare professionals will be guided on how to incorporate leadership strategies into their daily practice to improve both individual and organisational performance.
Designed for both those pursuing an SPQ and those completing CPD, this module helps professionals further their leadership capabilities, advance clinical practice, and lead innovative change in healthcare environments.
The module may include: Foundations of Nursing Leadership in Community Practice
Leadership Theories and Models in Healthcare
Compassionate and Ethical Leadership
Managing People, Resources, and Budgets
Quality Improvement Strategies in Community Health
Change Management and Innovation in Practice
Clinical Decision-Making in Community Settings
Partnerships, Advocacy, and Service User Engagement
Auditing, Evaluation, and Outcome Measurement
Overcoming Challenges in Quality Improvement
Inclusive Leadership and Cultural Competency
Emerging Trends: Digital, Sustainable, and Green Leadership
Leadership in Specialist Practice
Change management models
Assessment Strategy
Assessment Grading Criteria The following grading thresholds outline the expectations for academic performance and professional capability in relation to the role of the Specialist Practitioner. These criteria are aligned with the module learning outcomes, the standards set by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), and the academic regulations of the University, which expect students to demonstrate progression in critical thinking, academic integrity, and reflective, evidence-informed practice. Assessment outcomes are benchmarked against university-wide marking criteria to ensure consistency, fairness, and academic rigour.
Excellent Pass (A-) An excellent pass is awarded for work of outstanding academic quality. This includes: A comprehensive and critical understanding of the subject area. Independent thinking, originality, and depth in analysis and argumentation. Sophisticated use of evidence and effective synthesis of information to support practice. Work that is logically reasoned, clearly structured, and reflects a high standard of academic scholarship. Advanced critical thinking and reflective capacity, demonstrating strong engagement with the topic.
Good Pass (B-) A good pass reflects a consistent and competent level of academic performance. Students at this level demonstrate: A sound understanding of core concepts and frameworks. Evidence of critical analysis and the ability to integrate theoretical knowledge with practical application. Thoughtful reflection on aspects of leadership, coproduction, and healthcare improvement. A logical and clear academic structure, with appropriate use of supporting evidence. Compliance with the academic expectations for postgraduate study, including critical engagement and clarity of expression.
Threshold (Pass – C-) To achieve a pass, students must attain a minimum grade of C-. This grade demonstrates that the student has: Met the essential module requirements. Engaged with core content at a foundational level, with limited but appropriate application of relevant knowledge to practice. Demonstrated a basic ability to reflect on key areas such as nursing leadership and quality improvement. Identified relevant evidence, though analysis and synthesis may be limited. Met expectations for academic integrity, presentation, and adherence to academic conventions such as referencing and structure.
This reflects the university’s highest expectations for postgraduate academic achievement, including intellectual originality, advanced critical thinking, and clear synthesis of knowledge into professional practice.
Learning Outcomes
- Apply reflective frameworks to critically examine the role of compassionate and inclusive leadership, with a focus on coproduction approaches that enable sustainable and meaningful improvements in health and social care.
- Critically analyse clinical decision-making processes, integrating evidence to explore the complexities, challenges, and strengths that underpin effective and ethical practice in leadership roles.
- Critically evaluate the influence of nursing leadership on quality improvement and innovation, drawing on contemporary evidence to assess its impact on service delivery and patient outcomes.
- Critically synthesise and evaluate evidence-based strategies for quality improvement, integrating them into diverse healthcare contexts and systematically assessing their effectiveness in enhancing the quality and safety of care.
Assessment method
Report
Assessment type
Summative
Description
Part 1: Written Quality Improvement Project Report Produce a critical, evidence-based report detailing the design, implementation, and evaluation of a quality improvement (QI) initiative within your area of practice. The report should: •Critically evaluate the role of nursing leadership in driving the QI initiative, referencing relevant leadership theories and evidence (LO1). •Apply a reflective framework to explore your leadership approach, with emphasis on compassionate leadership and inclusive co-production (LO2). •Appraise and synthesise evidence-based QI strategies, justifying your chosen methods and evaluating their practical application (LO3). •Analyse the clinical decision-making processes involved, including challenges, ethical considerations, and the integration of evidence to support effective practice (LO4). Assessment Criteria: •Depth of critical analysis and synthesis of evidence •Application of leadership and QI theory to practice •Use of reflective frameworks •Integration of clinical decision-making and evidence •Academic writing and referencing
Weighting
50%
Due date
30-11-2026
Assessment method
Individual Presentation
Assessment type
Summative
Description
Part 2: Poster or Presentation Create either an academic poster (equivalent of 6 A4 pages ) or a 15-minute narrated presentation to communicate the key elements of your Quality Improvement (QI) project to a professional audience. This should include - A concise summary of the project’s aims, methods, and outcomes, showcasing your ability to appraise and synthesise evidence-based strategies for quality improvement (U3). - Clear articulation of leadership strategies and their impact, critically evaluating how nursing leadership influences quality improvement and innovation (U1). - Visual or verbal demonstration of evidence-based practice and decision-making, analysing the challenges and strengths of clinical decision-making and integrating evidence to support effective practice (U4). - Reflection on the implications for future leadership and service improvement, using a reflective framework to evaluate the role of compassionate leadership and inclusive coproduction in achieving sustainable improvements in healthcare (U2). Assessment Criteria: •Clarity, professionalism, and engagement •Effective communication of key concepts and impact •Integration of leadership and QI evidence •Visual or verbal coherence and structure
Weighting
50%
Assessment method
Written Plan/Proposal
Assessment type
Formative
Description
The formative assessment provides an opportunity to develop and receive feedback on an outline plan for the proposed Quality Improvement (QI) project. It is designed to support the preparation for both summative components (Part 1: Written Report and Part 2: Poster/Presentation) by encouraging early engagement with the project’s key elements and alignment with the module’s learning outcomes. Task: Submit a 500-word outline that includes: - Project Title and Rationale: Briefly describe the area of practice and the need for improvement, referencing relevant evidence. - Aims and Objectives: Clearly state what the QI initiative seeks to achieve. - Proposed Methods: Outline the strategies and approaches you intend to use, including leadership and decision-making frameworks. - Anticipated Outcomes: Describe the expected impact on practice, service delivery, or patient experience. - Leadership Considerations: Identify how nursing leadership will influence the project, including compassionate and inclusive approaches. - Evidence Base: Mention key sources or frameworks that will inform your project design and implementation. Feedback Focus: The student will receive formative feedback on: Clarity and feasibility of the project plan Relevance and integration of leadership and QI theory Alignment with learning outcomes (U1–U4) Use of evidence and reflective thinking
Weighting
0%